Uma análise bakhtiniana do “juridiquês” em posts do STJ no facebook

Abstract

This Course Conclusion Paper addresses the issue of accessibility of legal language - "legalese" - presenting effective actions that the STJ (Superior Court of Justice) is promoting through statements of the post genre on its Facebook page to make the speech less complicated legal framework for the lay public. In this sense, it analyzes the responsiveness of these statements, working on the hypothesis that they respond to other pre-existing statements that materialized dialogues that considered the legal language hardly understandable to the Brazilian population. Thus, the objective is to answer how the STJ seeks to make legal language accessible on Facebook through its posts, based on the Bakhtinian perspective for the analysis of four posts collected from the STJ page on Facebook, bringing the notions of dialogue, enunciation and speech genres. Thus, the collating methodology (GERALDI, 2012) is used to analyze the dialogical relationships between the discourses of the posts presented here, seeking to indicate that, despite the stability of the characteristic utterances of the post type genres on Facebook, the language used by the STJ is still loaded with technical terms, coming from a subject who is a specialist in the legal field.